Related Publications
Online Language Teaching: Crises and Creativities
Insights into Teaching and Learning Writing
Insights into Autonomy and Technology in Language Teaching
Insights into Flipped Classrooms
Insights into Task-Based Language Teaching
Proceedings of the XXIst International CALL Research Conference
Insights into Professional Development in Language Teaching
Smart CALL: Personalization, Contextualization, & Socialization
An investigation of learners’ use of CAN and COULD
Lauren Whitty 
– CAN and COULD have multiple uses and multiple interpretations which can be difficult for learners of English to understand.
| Author(s) | |
|---|---|
| Paper type | Regular Articles |
| Pages | 32-46 |
| DOI | |
| Year |
Abstract
CAN and COULD have multiple uses and multiple interpretations which can be difficult for learners of English to understand. For example, the difference of Can you help me? and Could you help me? may go unnoticed to an English language learner, but a native speaker of English would recognise a difference in politeness. The current paper reports on an investigation of learners’ use of the modal auxiliaries CAN and COULD, including their negative counterparts (cannot/can’t and could not/couldn’t), in an English Proficiency Program (EPP) classroom at a New Zealand University. Through first examining the learners’ use of CAN and COULD in spoken and written contexts, comparisons are made to their use in the British National Corpus, which results in the identification of areas in which learners’ use could be strengthened.
Suggested citation
Whitty, L. (2019). An investigation of learners' use of CAN and COULD. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v2n1.116