This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Enhancing Japanese university students’ English language presentation skills with mobile-video recordings
Sean H. Toland, Daniel J. Mills, Megumi Kohyama
– In universities throughout Japan, English language learners are required to stand in front of their peers and make a presentation with the aid of software such as Microsoft PowerPoint.
In universities throughout Japan, English language learners are required to stand in front of their peers and make a presentation with the aid of software such as Microsoft PowerPoint. This type of public speaking activity can often be an anxiety-inducing, glorified reading or memorization exercise of text-heavy slides that fails to meet the intended objective of developing the learners’ presentation skills. This paper reports on the perceptions of Japanese university students toward an action research project that utilized poster presentations in conjunction with mobile-video reflective feedback. An activity systems analysis helped uncover the systemic contradictions and tensions that existed in the participants’ English as a foreign language (EFL) oral presentation lessons. One hundred and twenty-nine undergraduate economics students from nine classes completed a paper-based survey. In addition, seven students from the same second-year international economics course participated in a focus group interview. The results indicated that most participants viewed mobile-video enhanced self- and peer-reflective feedback as beneficial tools that could help improve the quality of their EFL presentation performances. However, many students expressed concern about public speaking anxiety, the protection of personal privacy, as well as the cultural contrast between Western and Japanese presentation styles.
Suggested citationToland, S.H., Mills, D.J., & Kohyama, M. (2016). Enhancing Japanese university students' English language presentation skills with mobile-video recordings. The JALT CALL Journal, 12(3), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v12n3.207