The JALT CALL Journal

Published in association
with the JALT CALL SIG



1.6
2022CiteScore
 
79th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

Related Publications

Online Language Teaching: Crises and Creativities

Online Language Teaching: Crises and Creativities

Edited by Ursula Stickler & Martina Emke (2023) Online Language Teaching: Crises and Creativities collects…
Insights into Teaching and Learning Writing

Insights into Teaching and Learning Writing

Edited by Hassan Mohebbi  & Yijen Wang  (2023) Writing is one of the most challenging skills…
Insights into Autonomy and Technology in Language Teaching

Insights into Autonomy and Technology in Language Teaching

Chun Lai  (2023) Drawing on the literature and research findings from relevant research fields, including…
Insights into Flipped Classrooms

Insights into Flipped Classrooms

Adrian Leis  (2023) This book is aimed at those interested in the flipped learning model as…
Insights into Task-Based Language Teaching

Insights into Task-Based Language Teaching

Sima Khezrlou  (2022) This book aims to offer a unique contribution to the expanding literature on…
Proceedings of the XXIst International CALL Research Conference

Proceedings of the XXIst International CALL Research Conference

Edited by Jozef Colpaert , Yijen Wang , Glenn Stockwell  (2022) The theme of the XXIst International CALL…
Insights into Professional Development in Language Teaching

Insights into Professional Development in Language Teaching

Thomas S.C. Farrell  (2022) From entering a teacher education program for initial qualifications onwards, language teachers…
Smart CALL: Personalization, Contextualization, & Socialization

Smart CALL: Personalization, Contextualization, & Socialization

Edited by Jozef Colpaert , Glenn Stockwell  (2022) The contributions in this volume focus on a…

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

DOI: 10.29140/jaltcall.v16n2.342
Open Access

Machine versus human translation outputs: Which one results in better reading comprehension among EFL learners?

Mojtaba Maghsoudi, Vahid Mirzaeian

– EFL university students in general and Iranian EFL university learners in particular, specifically in the commencement of their study at bachelor degree prefer to have their assigned English texts translated into mother tongue since they do not have a good command of the language.


Author(s)

,

Paper type

Regular Papers

Pages

69-84

DOI

https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v16n2.342

Year



Abstract

EFL university students in general and Iranian EFL university learners in particular, specifically in the commencement of their study at bachelor degree prefer to have their assigned English texts translated into mother tongue since they do not have a good command of the language. Machine translation (MT) has recently turned into a favorite tool for all students including EFL ones since it is free and readily available. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the effect of MT output on such students. To achieve this goal, two sample texts in students’ mother tongue were selected and translated into English by a proficient human translator whose native language was English and by an MT system (Google Translate). Next, 167 homogenous EFL freshman students were given a proficiency test and 152 homogenous ones randomly assigned to two groups, namely, control and experimental groups. The control group was given the human translation (HT) and the experimental group was exposed to machine translation. Using an independent t-test, indicated that there was a negligible difference between mentioned groups. That is, MT has improved to such an extent that it can compete with the HT. It can be concluded that due to its great improvements in the last few years and its widespread use among university students, EFL educators should accept the presence of this tool and try to implement it effectively in their teaching instead of banning students from using it.

Suggested citation

Mojtaba Maghsoudi, Vahid Mirzaeian. (2020). Machine versus human translation outputs: Which one results in better reading comprehension among EFL learners?. The JALT CALL Journal, 16(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v16n2.342

Please wait while flipbook is loading. For more related info, FAQs and issues please refer to documentation.

 

%d bloggers like this: