Published in association
with the JALT CALL SIG
About this Journal
Information for Authors
Related Publications
Online Language Teaching: Crises and Creativities
Insights into Teaching and Learning Writing
Insights into Autonomy and Technology in Language Teaching
Insights into Flipped Classrooms
Insights into Task-Based Language Teaching
Proceedings of the XXIst International CALL Research Conference
Insights into Professional Development in Language Teaching
Smart CALL: Personalization, Contextualization, & Socialization


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The viability of computer-assisted classroom discussion (CACD) as a facilitator of communicative interaction
Basim Alahmadi
– This study sets out to investigate how the use of Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion (CACD) might facilitate the introduction of a task-based approach designed to promote greater NNS-NNS interaction in the target-language thus improving Second Language Acquisition (SLA).
Author(s) | |
---|---|
Paper type | Regular Articles |
Pages | 3-32 |
DOI | |
Year |
Abstract
This study sets out to investigate how the use of Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion (CACD) might facilitate the introduction of a task-based approach designed to promote greater NNS-NNS interaction in the target-language thus improving Second Language Acquisition (SLA). Eight Saudi students (four dyads) were involved in 3 CACDs attempting to jointly complete three tasks: two information-gap and one decision-making. The study attempts to explore: 1) whether CACD can promote communicative interaction; 2) whether CACD can be implemented to generate meaning negotiation; 3) what interactional modifications are employed while using CACD. Participants’ chat scripts were analysed using a discourse analysis method. The data suggests that CACD can foster interactive competence among participants, which can in turn create facilitative conditions for a successful SLA. In general, CACD provides the participants with many opportunities to produce modified L2 output and receive comprehensible L2 input as a verified feedback. Participants managed to carry out only a handful of negotiated routines; nevertheless, the results show that participants employed a wide range of interactional moves such as clarification requests and giving feedback. To summarise, the study indicates that there could be a significant role for CACD as a vehicle for communicative interaction.
Suggested citation
Alahmadi, B. (2007). The viability of computer-assisted classroom discussion (CACD) as a facilitator of communicative interaction. The JALT CALL Journal, 3(3), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v3n3.42