Related Publications
Online Language Teaching: Crises and Creativities
Insights into Teaching and Learning Writing
Insights into Autonomy and Technology in Language Teaching
Insights into Flipped Classrooms
Insights into Task-Based Language Teaching
Proceedings of the XXIst International CALL Research Conference
Insights into Professional Development in Language Teaching
Smart CALL: Personalization, Contextualization, & Socialization
Low-Confidence Responses on the Vocabulary Size Test
Paul Hutchinson
– McDonald and Asaba (Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2015) reported an administration of the Vocabulary Size Test that was modified to include ”I don’t know” as a fifth response option on all items, and in which participants later responded to the items originally marked as ”I don’t know”.
| Author(s) | |
|---|---|
| Paper type | Regular Article |
| Pages | 49-51 |
| DOI | |
| Year |
Abstract
McDonald and Asaba (Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2015) reported an administration of the Vocabulary Size Test that was modified to include ”I don’t know” as a fifth response option on all items, and in which participants later responded to the items originally marked as ”I don’t know”. McDonald and Asaba were inclined to favour the score calculated without the later (reluctant or low-confidence) responses. It is argued here that this goes beyond the data. In many educational contexts,strong encouragement is given to respond when unsure, as examinees to have a better-than-chance probability of being correct, and will be disadvantaged if they do not respond.
Suggested citation
Hutchinson, P. (2015). Low-Confidence Responses on the Vocabulary Size Test. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 4(2), 49–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.7820/vli.v04.2.hutchinson